Sam Ruby wrote:
Net result is approximately a steady state. That's not in the working group's best interests.
Please consider closing a bunch of link Paces per http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg10800.html
So... the process change I would like to propose is that we focus on reducing the amount of Paces that simply get thrown back to languish. And my proposal is simple: in order for a scheduled Pace to be sent back, at group of people - including at least one detractor - volunteer to work on producing a version that they can live with.
Fair enough?
Yes.
Robert Sayre
