On 14/11/04 4:02 AM, "Bob Wyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Imagine that there are two feeds that you wish to read: A and B. > Now, imagine that you have two choices for how to read the content > of these two feeds: > > 1. Receive each feed individually > 2. Or, Receive both feeds in a composite feed imagine an author writes an entry, and then publishes it... 1. in his main feed 2. in a category-specific feed 3. in some planet-x feed 4. in an RSS 1.0 feed for backwards compatibility is that the same entry occurring in four different places, or is it four different entries? My sense is that it is the same entry. If that entry is then aggregated into a composite feed, does it matter which feed it originally came from? The essential nature of an entry is fully contained* within the entry itself, and does not need rely on some context to give it proper meaning. The context may give additional meaning, or it may not, but nonetheless it's not part of the entry. That's my sense of it. e.
