On 15/11/04 6:11 AM, "Henry Story" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems a little silly to avoid simplifications to the spec, for some > hypothetical distinction we may want to draw in the future. but it's not a simplification. it's shorter, maybe, but not simpler. with it, every time we want to add some element or attribute to either the head concept or the entry concept we have to take pains to spectext which it is relevant to, and spectext it in a manner that makes sense in the context of the superclass. This is the consequence of the superclass for re-use antipattern. e.
