On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Antone Roundy wrote:I noticed this Pace doesn't mention canonicalization, and from what I can tell, RFC2396bis section 3 leaves room for variety in how a URI may be formed. Shall we add language similar to that found in section 3.6 (identity constructs), specifically 3.5.1 (recommended normalization strategry) and 3.6.2 (character-by-character comparison)? We could also simply refer to those sections and say "follow the same rules".
I don't see the need. Links and identity are different:
Comparison is a fundamental aspect of identity.
Fetching is a fundamental aspect of links.
Okay, I wasn't clear--I was referring to the URIs that are used as @rel values for things not in the registry.
