On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
The draft doesn't list a lot of rel values because we couldn't come to consensus on them.The API draft has a number of rel values which PaceFieldingLinks is trying to remove.
There's no reason to get bogged down in this discussion.My recollection is that where we've bogged down is on discussion of whether and how to make link extensible, and that discussion of specific @rel values has simply been drowned out by that discussion. But if no one speaks up in support of "about", "start", "prev", "next" and "comment", then fine--I'll shut my mouth.
There's a registry. People will use it.There's a way to mint @rel values without the registry. People will use it.
