Yes. I'll be sure to add it. Franklin Tse wrote: > I agree. Should this be specify in the next draft? > > Franklin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Franklin Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "atom-syntax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "atom-protocol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 23:49 > Subject: Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last Call > >> My preference is that invalid values are silently ignored and that the >> directionality is inherited. >> >> - James >>[snip]
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last Call Franklin Tse
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last Call James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last Call peaceable_whale
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal Last C... James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal La... Franklin Tse
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Inform... James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - In... Franklin Tse
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update ... James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Informal La... James Holderness
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Inform... James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - Inform... Franklin Tse
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update - In... James M Snell
- Re: Atom Bidi Draft Update ... Franklin Tse
