On 24/5/07 9:30 PM, "Becker, Matthew R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original message referred to a standard ordering. By that I was
> referring to APP Draft 14, section 10 "The Entries in the returned Atom
> Feed SHOULD be ordered by their "atom:updated" property, with the most
> recently updated Entries coming first in the document order."
>
> We have large feeds so we implemented paging according to section 10.1
> of APP draft 14.
>
> Assuming I've interpreted the APP draft correctly, we should be sending
> paged feeds where the entries are ordered by atom:updated.
draft 15 has this:
The Entries in the returned Atom Feed SHOULD be ordered by their
"app:edited" property, with the most recently edited Entries coming
first in the document order. The app:edited value is not equivalent to
the HTTP Last-Modified: header and cannot be used to determine the
freshness of cached responses.
http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.html
e.
