Hi Don, * Don Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-21 02:05]: > 2. I think it might make more sense to create an extension > designed to enhanced digital-signature support. Such an > extension would include a 'marker' element to indicate that > signatures within, if any, are likely damaged. A feed > processing agent downstream can then use the marker to avoid > alarming the user unnecessarily.
would that really be any gain? It seems to me that it’s just shifting the complexity around. It’s real easy for a server to detect that a signature appears to be present even if it lacks digsig validation code. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
