http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html
It would be a simple matter of adding inheritance relations from Dublin Core to AtomOwl. If you would like to contribute such a mapping feel free to propose it on the mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/atom-owl/This ontology has not mooved much in the past year. It would be nice if a group of people could go over it one last time, so that we can place it at a URL that would get as wide an acceptance as possible.
It used to be part of the atom charter to have a semantics for atom. Henry Home page: http://bblfish.net/ Sun Blog: http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/ Foaf name: http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#me On 10 Sep 2007, at 23:18, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
Hi list,Can anyone please explain to me why the Atom 1.0 specification defined it's own elements instead of using Dublin Core elements? For example, why use<rights> and not <dc:rights> taken from Dublin Core's XML name space?Hope anyone understands what I am asking about and have an answer for me. ^^-- Daniel Aleksandersen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
