cf:treatAs talks about the ordering of the list; fh:complete doesn't.
That said, I don't think there's much harm in using both.
Cheers,
On 30/09/2007, at 5:55 PM, Franklin Tse wrote:
Hi all,
<fh:complete /> in RFC 5005 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5005)
and <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs> in the Simple List Extensions
Specification (http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/rss/sle/) have the
same meaning. However, only the latter one is being supported by
feed readers at the moment.
I am not sure if there has been any feed reader supporting
<fh:complete />, but I want to add the element to my feed as more
implementations of RFC 5005 are expected in the future.
Is it a good practice to use both <fh:complete /> and
<cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs> in the same feed?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/
syndication/history/1.0" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/
rss/core/2005" xml:lang="en">
...
<fh:complete />
<cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
...
</feed>
Regards,
Franklin
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
