Yeah, what they said. I'm pretty stupid when it comes to atom, but we're looking at how to apply it in some enterprisey situations with some fairly simple information (e.g. "business partner"), and with some fairly complex hierarchical information (e.g. "insurance policy and all risks it covers").
So far it looks like the deeply hierarchical stuff would be linked and entries describing the various parts will exist on their own to represent manipulations at the level of the part. The parts in and of themselves are not "entries" though. So you might get a feed of entries at the policy level. The policy content would link directly to a risk, or a party playing a role in the policy, or... i.e. the policy would not be linked to an entry for the risk, party, ... But say a change of address occurs for some party. Then an entry for that party would show up in a feed. The party content would also link back one way or another to the associated policies. But again it would not link back to an entry for that policy. Not sure if I answered anyone's questions, but if that triggers any emotions... -Patrick
