On Dec 18, 2007 4:31 PM, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FYI; I'd love any feedback folks have on this. > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: 19 December 2007 7:15:02 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-fiql-00.txt > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > > > Title : FIQL: The Feed Item Query Language > > Author(s) : M. Nottingham > > Filename : draft-nottingham-atompub-fiql-00.txt > > Pages : 16 > > Date : 2007-12-18 > >
I'm uncomfortable with prescribing how to construct URIs (sec. 4), aren't you? It takes control of the URI namespace away from the server. You can get the effect you want by POSTing an entity containing the FIQL string (give it mime type application/fiql say) and allowing the server to respond directly with the result, or return 303 to the URI of a cacheable representation. Let the server construct the URI. Hugh
