Err, I missed two bits while writing:
* Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-02 01:05]:
> Doesn’t matter. I preemptively pointed that out just to say
> that even if you wanted to propose that feed readers poll every
> permalink on every feed poll (), that wouldn’t even work.
^ (obviously absurd)
> And that reminds that 401 is further useless, because the
> permalink of such Entries is distinguished from the blog post
^ commonly
> permalink only through a fragment identifier, so they have no
> public identity in HTTP separate from the blog post itself.
>
> Sorry, 401 doesn’t cut it. Communicating deletion requires the
> Atom ID, not the permalink, and a timestamp, and that’s all
> that should be required, which disqualifies the use of
> atom:entry as the vehicle.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
