On 2008-01-31 01:01, you wrote: > On 1/30/08, Daniel Aleksandersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am curious about the status of the required <div> container when > > including xhtml in text constructs. With it be changed to become > > optional instead? The below example never made much sense to me. > > Bear in mind that the div element used within "xhtml" content should > not actually appear within the resulting content. When an Atom > application parses this feed, it's expected to drop the div element and > only use the content within it. If your intent is to include only an > XHTML paragraph element, the first example is actually correct. The > div element shouldn't persist.
Then what is wrong with the below? <summary type="xhtml" xmlns:xht="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> <xht:p>Is this such a <xht:strong>bold</xht:strong> thing to do?</xht:p> </summary> I am trying to understand why XHTML fragments must be contained within two containers (the atom:summary AND the xht:div elements). -- Daniel Aleksandersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
