> But my question on why the atom:id element is being used > instead of the xml:id attribute still stands.
But... atom:id has to contain an IRI. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-4.2.6
> But my question on why the atom:id element is being used > instead of the xml:id attribute still stands.
But... atom:id has to contain an IRI. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-4.2.6