On 23/4/08 3:46 AM, "Brian Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not have at:deleted-entry contain app:edited and/or atom:updated > instead of @when? Then say that timestamps should be compared using the > same date construct (compare only app:edited to app:edited, and > atom:updated to atom:updated). AtomPub collections would use app:edited > and most other collections would use atom:updated, just like they do > with atom:entry already today. +1 : elegant, simple > This would allow a feed to indicate that it supports this feature, even > when no entries have been deleted: > > <at:deleted-entries/> > > Knowing that the collection provides these tombstones would all clients > to skip crawling the collection to look for deleted entries. +1 also e.
