Right now, no. I'm basically punting the features stuff completely.
If/when something is standardized, I'll revisit. I just no longer have
enough of an immediate need for it to justify the time and effort to
work on it myself.
- James
Jan Algermissen wrote:
James,
will your evolved use case eventually lead to a public (draft) APP
extension that overlaps with what the features draft expresses?
Jan
On May 15, 2008, at 4:50 PM, James M Snell wrote:
The Atom Features Draft has expired. There was some interest expressed
in having it moved forward but there was no solid consensus formed
around the approach. At this point, I don't really have the time or
need to move it forward (the original need for which it was developed
has evolved). If anyone else feels that it is an important thing to
move forward, I will gladly hand over the xml of the source doc and will
offer input however I can.
- James
--
Jan Algermissen
INTAKI . http://www.intaki.com/
