On 24/5/08 2:35 AM, "Antone Roundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brian Smith wrote: >> I agree that other formats are possible (and unlikely to be worse), but >> I don't see the harm in reserving rel='service' for AtomPub service >> documents. If you come up with a better mechanism/format for doing >> service discovery then it would be better to distance it from the >> application/atomsvc+xml document type by using different link relations. > > "Distancing" future service document formats from > application/atomsvc+xml documents is link/@type's job, not link/@rel's. > That's what link/@type is for, and it's perfectly capable of expressing > the distinction. I see no benefit in, nor any reason to limit the scope > of the service link relation. +1 use @type to distinguish format of document, @rel to distinguish role of document. e.
