On 30/5/08 8:19 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I've said, "related" is void for vagueness and IMHO meaningless. @rel='related' is more like zero - it at once means nothing and has no value, yet is incredibly important. Similarly so for alt="" on images. It is mu. What link relation would you use if the related resource is not an alternate representation, nor describes the service parameters, nor is the license, nor is the feed source, nor any other known @rel value? e.
