Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Richard Salz <[email protected]> [2009-01-07 00:15]:
I don't like usurping the "human-readable" intent of atom:content.
Atom makes no constraint that the content be human-readable. That
was in fact one of the goals differentiating it from RSS: the
ability to carry content other than plaintext or HTML.
If you want the feed to also be human-consumable, provide a
reasonable facsimile of the context in text or HTML form in the
summary.
What Aristotle said. Formally speaking, atom:content isn't a Text
construct and so doesn't imply its human readable intent.
Bill
