On 3/2/09 2:22 PM, "Richard Salz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -1 for QNames in content.
>
> Yeah, I don't really disagree. But I kinda dislike {uri}lname because it
> looks too much like XSLT's AVT :)
instead of QNames, how about something like this:
<link rel="schema" x:schema="notQName" href="foo.xsd" type="text/xsd" />
<link rel="schema" x:schema="notQName" href="foo.dtd" type="text/dtd" />
<atom:content type="..." x:schema="notQName">
<foo:blarg />
</atom:content>
(obviously, I'm only guessing at the l...@type values there)
e.
