Since this link relation is based on the POWDER stuff, it is pretty well-baked. Any input on approving this link relation registry request?
Thanks, Lisa ---- From: Phil Archer <[email protected]> Download (untitled) / with headers text/plain 1.3k This is a request to make a new entry in the Atom Link Relations registry [1]. Attribute Value: describedby Description: The relationship A 'describedby' B asserts that resource B provides a description of resource A. There are no constraints on the format or representation of either A or B, neither are there any further constraints on either resource. Expected display characteristics: None Security considerations: Descriptions of resources may be socially sensitive, may require processing to be understood and may or may not not be accurate. Consumers of descriptive resources should be aware of the source and chain of custody of the data. Security considerations for URIs (Section 7 of RFC 3986) and IRIs (Section 8 of RFC 3987 ) apply to the extent that describing resources may affect consumers' decisions about how or whether to retrieve those resources. Documentation: Future stable URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-dr/#assoc-linking Temporary URI at the time of submission: http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-dr/20090204-diff.html#assoc-linki ng (requires W3C Member access). An unrestricted version of the same document is available at http://philarcher.org/powder/dr/20090204-diff.html#assoc-linking [1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml
