+1 -- push it, please.
On 20/02/2009, at 5:06 AM, James Holderness wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
Good to know. I could push the draft forward with Informational
status. That would allow us to finalize it and get it an RFC# but
it wouldn't be standards track. Would that be sufficient?
It doesn't matter to me whether it's informational or standards
track - just that it's finalized. I was concerned that you might, at
some point, revert back to the format you were using in drafts 2 and
3, which is not compatible with my implementation.
Regards
James
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
