CMIS adds CMIS element to the workspace element in the atompub service document. I am not aware of requirements from CMIS for representing features at the collection level.
FYI - Here's an example of the features/capabilities CMIS advertises in the
atompub workspace element:
<ns5:repositoryInfo>
<ns1:repositoryId>repid1</ns1:repositoryId>
<ns1:repositoryName>Repository1</ns1:repositoryName>
<ns1:repositoryRelationship>self</ns1:repositoryRelationship>
<ns1:repositoryDescription>CMIS Repository Description</
ns1:repositoryDescription>
<ns1:vendorName>CMIS Vendor 1</ns1:vendorName>
<ns1:productName>CMIS Prototype for VendorX</ns1:productName>
<ns1:productVersion>0.61</ns1:productVersion>
<ns1:rootFolderId>rootfolder</ns1:rootFolderId>
<ns1:capabilities>
<ns1:capabilityMultifiling>true</ns1:capabilityMultifiling>
<ns1:capabilityUnfiling>true</ns1:capabilityUnfiling>
<ns1:capabilityVersionSpecificFiling>true</
ns1:capabilityVersionSpecificFiling>
<ns1:capabilityPWCUpdateable>true</
ns1:capabilityPWCUpdateable>
<ns1:capabilityPWCSearchable>true</
ns1:capabilityPWCSearchable>
<ns1:capabilityAllVersionsSearchable>true</
ns1:capabilityAllVersionsSearchable>
<ns1:capabilityQuery>bothcombined</ns1:capabilityQuery>
<ns1:capabilityJoin>innerandouter</ns1:capabilityJoin>
<ns1:capabilityChanges>all</ns1:capabilityChanges>
<ns1:capabilityChangesOnType>document</
ns1:capabilityChangesOnType>
<ns1:capabilityChangesOnType>folder</
ns1:capabilityChangesOnType>
<ns1:changesIncomplete>true</ns1:changesIncomplete>
</ns1:capabilities>
<ns1:cmisVersionSupported>0.61</ns1:cmisVersionSupported>
</ns5:repositoryInfo>
-Al
Al Brown
Emerging Standards and Industry Frameworks
CMIS: https://w3.tap.ibm.com/w3ki07/display/ECMCMIS/Home
Industry Frameworks: https://w3.tap.ibm.com/w3ki07/display/ECMIF/Home
Office 714 327 3453
Mobile 714 263 6441
Email [email protected]
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The contents of this message, including any
attachments, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the
person or entity to whom the message was addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, please be advised that any
dissemination, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify
the sender. Please also permanently delete all copies of the original
message and any attached documentation.
From: James M Snell <[email protected]>
To: atom-syntax <[email protected]>
Date: 06/08/2009 03:36 PM
Subject: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?
Ok, so we'd made quite a bit of progress on the Atom features draft a
while back and then I decided to sit and watch to see if there was a
strong enough need for the extensions. At this point, I have not seen
anyone jumping up and down demanding the functionality provided by the
Features draft so I'm wondering if I should just consider it Dead for
Good. Thoughts?
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
