For what it's worth, on the slim chance that someone reads my (negative) comments on this draft on atom-syntax back when it was first proposed -- I now think those objections were ill-considered. This looks v. good.
--peter keane 2009/6/10 Niklas Lindström <[email protected]> > > Hi James, > > that's great to hear! Is it thus likely that this will become an > Informational RFC in a foreseeable future? > > And if so, will the current namespace > <http://purl.org/atompub/tombstones/1.0> be the final one (and e.g. > redirect to the RFC)? > > Best regards, > Niklas > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, James M Snell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As requested, the Atom Tombstones draft has been revitalize > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-06.txt > > > > Changed this from Experimental to Informational and updated the IPR > > boilerplate. > > > > - James > > > > > >
