But it isn't, You can never just dump the bits in; you have to be
careful about things like namespace declarations, entity declarations,
xml:lang, xml:base, and atom-specific things that may or may not be
inherited.
For better or worse, people do react negatively to extra layers of
elements like this.
On 13/07/2009, at 3:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Mark,
True, the following is more verbose...
<atom:link rel="something" href="...">
<ae:inline>
<atom:feed>
...
</atom:feed>
</ae:inline>
</atom:link>
than either of the alternatives you suggest, yet it strikes me that
then
being able to inline an atom feed, rather than something that is not
an
atom feed (even if it looks an awful lot like an atom feed) is a good
trade for that verbosity?
Cornelia
Cornelia Davis
Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, Office of the CTO
[email protected]
p: 805.560.9039
m: 805.452.8941
f: 805.880.0390
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
