Mo McRoberts wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I’ve come across a requirement in the course of a project I’m working on > for a format which is a little richer and more readily-extensible than > OPML. Creating something Atom-based was a natural fit for my needs, and > so that’s what I’ve done. > > Although I have no particular expectations of this supplanting OPML for > subscription exchange, I’d like to offer a draft version of this spec > for review by the (far more knowledgeable than me) folk here. I’ve had > good initial feedback, but it really needs a wider audience. >
Did you consider simply making an Atom feed of items which themselves represent feeds? Does this have any disadvantages over the new feedset element you've defined?
