On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16/09/2009, at 7:46 PM, Sam Johnston wrote: >> Would it be possible then to support multiple references so that people >> can see at a glance that a given relation is implemented as described in >> multiple formats (rather than just the first format that happened to >> register it)? May well not be worth the maintenance effort. > > How about adding a new field for references to more information about how a > relation is used in a particular context (scoped by context media type)? > > E.g., > > References regarding use in specific contexts: > text/html: [HTML5] > application/atom+xml: [RFC4287] >
Yes, that sounds like a great idea. And vaguely familiar: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2009JulSep/0699.html Thanks, -joe
