Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
Putting something under version control really doesn't mean anything
beyond having multiple versions of the resource.
There are of course a variety of other features supported by many
versioning servers, but having a version history is the lowest common
denominator.
So yes, this draft would apply to the case you describe, as long as
multiple separately addressable versions of the resource are provided.
Cheers,
Geoff
...
Agreed.
At least for the link relations that support the navigation between
versions it really doesn't matter whether internally a version control
system was used. (For the working-copy related relations things may be
different because they somehow imply authorability of a resource).
Best regards, Julian
