Hi, Just curious if anyone has done this or has opinions either way; e.g.
<link href="http://example.com/path/to/{deviceType}/movie/resource"; type="video/quicktime" /> Where the client applications know to substitute the parameter appropriately. Versus using Media RSS or similar: <media:group> <media:content url="http://example.com/movie1.mov"; fileSize="15555" type="video/quicktime" medium="video" isDefault="true" expression="full" bitrate="128" framerate="25" samplingrate="44.1" channels="2" duration="185" height="200" width="300" lang="en"/> <media:content url="http://example.com/movie2.mov"; fileSize="12345" type="video/quicktime" medium="video" isDefault="true" expression="full" bitrate="128" framerate="25" samplingrate="44.1" channels="2" duration="185" height="200" width="300" lang="en" /> </media:group> For my domain (mobile applications) the smaller payload is quite attractive, and I control all of the clients of the feed, since I'm writing them. One niggle is that I don't think the URI template is a valid IRI, so validation tools might grouse. Cheers, James
