Very good question. Short answer is obviously yes it can be, but calling that out explicitly in the spec is a good idea. There are likely several concerns with this that would need to be considered... such as what if both the entry and deleted-entry include valid signatures but have been signed with different keys...
- James On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: > Can an at:delete-entry be signed in the same way that an Atom entry can be? > Should I be concerned about an unsigned at:delete-entry which tells me to > delete a signed entry? > bob wyman > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:10 AM, James Snell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Another backwards compatible update... explicitly allowing for an >> optional atom:source element as a child of at:deleted-entry. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-08.txt >> >> - James >> > > -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [email protected]
