hello hadrien.
On 2011-05-02 9:18, Hadrien Gardeur wrote:
+1. Media parameters are not sufficiently well defined yet, but I believe that this is the right solution to this problem.
philosophically, i agree. the question i am asking myself is how likely it is that this is actually going to happen. it might require a rewrite of the media type specification, and a rewrite of how content negotiation in HTTP interacts with that updated media type model. is that something that is likely to happen, in the mid term or at all? i am having my doubts, which is why i was suggesting my admittedly suboptimal approach, which has the advantage of layering on top of the existing architecture without the need for updating some of the core standards. short version: do you think the right solution is going to happen? and if not, what then?
cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:[email protected] - tel:+1-510-6432253 | | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
