Hi Danny,
Danny Ayers wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:48:57 -0500, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Does RSS 1.0 allow this? Yes, without a doubt, there is a complete supporting framework/language in which it is straightforward to
define
extensions on the same level as RSS (RDF/RDFS) or by building layers on top (OWL, rules etc).
Yes, but you can't use your standard RDF serializer to write the RSS1.
True, but that doesn't mean it can't be done.
And in fact it has been done ;-)
In Urchin we overrode RDF::Core::Model::Serializer to create an general RDF serializer that conforms to the RSS 1.0 restrictions (1). As long as, of course, there's some data using the RSS 1.0 vocabulary in the model being serialized...
Ta, Ben
1. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/urchin/urchin/Urchin/OutputFeed/RDF/Core/Model/Serializer.pm?rev=1.1&view=markup
******************************************************************************** DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents. Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS ********************************************************************************
