Ben Lund wrote:
> However, with RDF, you can just concatenate the triples.
Would that really be the right thing to do? In the example you gave,
the two different sets of triples were generated by different authors and
thus had differing contexts, trust metrics, authorship, etc. associated with
them. My gut feeling tells me that "source" information would need to be
preserved in most practical cases. While I see that in theory, simply
concatenating the triples makes sense -- I'm not sure if it would make sense
in the real world. Authorship/Attribution is important.
bob wyman
