Danny Ayers wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:49:54 -0500, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wasn't aware that RSS2 and Atom aren't extensible!
Does RSS 2.0 allow addition of new features? Well yes, if you wheel in
the XML namespaces layer and simultaneous knock out the "Simple" of
syntax that caused the old fork. Was it designed for this? I reckon
that's pushing it a little.
It certainly does depend on your definition of extensible. Saying RSS2.0 is extensible because I can drop in namespaced blocks is like saying my copy of the K&R is extensible because I can write notes in the margins.
cheers Bill
