In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Bob Wyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would strongly recommend that it be required that an atom:entry that is > > published with no enclosing atom:feed MUST contain an atom:head element. If > > this is not the case, the published atom:entries will be essentially > > anonymous and thus largely useless. Virtually every Atom processor in > > existence requires elements of atom:head when handling entries. I can > > imagine very few applications (other than closed ones) that could make use > > of atom:entries that do not contain atom:head elements and are not > > themselves enclosed in atom:feeds. > > That makes sense. I probably won't publish another version of the > Atom-over-XMPP draft until Atom becomes more stable, but I'll at least > add this to my working copy of the I-D. Forgive my ignorance, but I don't see any examples of atom:head within atom:entry, and the spec does not contain a schema. Is head allowed within entry? Peter
