Well, I had only read one side of the debate, so my information was incomplete. My apologies, and thanks Sam for the response.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:59:07 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Jacobs wrote: > > RSS 2.0 DOES have a one enclosure per entry restriction, so we're > > breaking RSS2 compatibility. Why wouldn't multiple enclosures be > > multiple posts? > > Where does it say that RSS 2.0 has a one enclosure per entry restriction? > > There have been discussions about whether or not RSS has such a > restriction. Some of these discussions took place on the feedvalidator > mailing list. Rogers Cadenhead (a member of the RSS Advisory Board) > hosted some on his weblog. > > The current state of RSS enclosures seems to be: there are some tools > that produce multiple enclosures per item. And there are some tools > which can't handle multiple enclosures per item. Both set of tools can > point to the spec to prove that they are "right". > > http://www.reallysimplesyndication.com/comments?u=reallySimpleSyndic&p=221&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reallysimplesyndication.com%2F2004%2F12%2F21%23a221 > http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/comment/2424 > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6237032&forum_id=37467 > http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/comment/2425 > > - Sam Ruby > >
