Norman Walsh wrote:
1. Is xml:base processing applied to the schema attribute of a Category
Construct?
It's a URI, rather a URI reference. From 2396bis:
"URI-reference = URI / relative-ref"
I guess this means we should put the "no relative references" language here as well.
2. Why MUST a feed point to an alternate version. What if the feed is all
I publish?
I don't know. I say we drop it.
3. 4.2.2 says
atom:head elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:link element with a rel attribute value of "alternate" that has the same type attribute value.
What if the atom:link elments have different hreflang values?
Or, for that matter, different titles and URIs. I think we should drop the restriction.
5. 7.1 says
Processing [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212]. Other XML signature mechanisms MUST NOT be used on the document element of an Atom document.
Are we sure we want to prohibit them?
I think we should drop that sentence.
Robert Sayre
