On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:54:27 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. Why MUST a feed point to an alternate version. What if the feed is all I publish?
Deja vu:
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg08836.html
I think this goes along with the alternate entry discussion which ended up in these paces:
<url: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceContentOrLink> <url: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceOptionalAlternateLink>
I'm -1 on removing this restriction.
I think alternate links for both entries and feeds should be optional, but I'm more eager to have it be optional for entries.
-- Asbj�rn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ �He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away�
