On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:36:43 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The objections to this fall into two forms:
1. We don't have prior art in the syndication space that proves this is needed.
2. This is someone else's problem, e.g. SOAP
...Or this isn't such a big problem at all. Let's not go there. -1.
And a decision to leave this out feels like hubris to me. "We're so sure we got the core right that we can leave out an extremely cheap potentially-valuable extension point." I doubt it.
I don't think that's how it is. We all want Atom to be extensible in as many ways as possible.
-- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
