On 25 Jan 2005, at 2:08 am, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 1:45 AM +0000 1/25/05, Graham wrote:1. Is there a deadline for new feature proposals? Has it passed?
It has passed. We have been talking about finishing for quite a while, and our March milestone is coming up quickly.
That sounds like you making excuses for not having advertised the deadline in advance.
It also seems to have encouraged proposals that are good in principle but poorly worded to be incorporated.
Hopefully disagree, but I assume you have examples that I might go "oh, yeah, good point" to.
It's not so much examples, but I can't think of any times when a Pace has been rejected because of mediocre language. Thus if the principal is sound the Pace is accepted regardless.
(though I will be listing examples willy and indeed nilly once the next draft is published)
Graham
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
