At 17:16 05/01/25, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Also; I sypmathize with supporting IRI, but that shouldn't mean it needs to replace any usage of URIs
Every URI is an IRI by definition. So all URIs that are in use can be used with Atom without any problems even if the spec says we use IRIs. Replacement is definitely not the right term.
>(for instance, I also think that the introduction into XMLNS 1.1 was a mistake).
Well, I might agree that it was a mistake. Observable behavior for most implementations (in particular XSLT implementations, where you most easily can test actual namespace behavior) allows IRIs in namespaces anyway, so this could just have been a clarification to the XMLNS 1.0 spec, rather than bumping up the number.
Regards, Martin.
