On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:22:24 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this implementation detail is exposed to the user, it would seem > reasonable to consider such a software a Atom-to-something-else con- > verter; you would thus seem to propose the introduction of conformance > requirements for Atom conversion programs into the specification. No? Not necessarily - although I take your point, it does look very application oriented and probably impossible to test within the scope of core Atom. But because it is defining the meaning of terms in the Atom namespace (atom:type will be equivalent to type) I believe this information should go in the normative part of the core spec. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
