On 26/1/05 4:44 AM, "Tim Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Agreed. Then the only comment that remains is:
>> 
>> # Also, could an additional requirement be added. Namely that
>> # aggregators use the URI in |rel="self"| to check for the feed next
>> # time?
> 
> -1
> 
> If I got the feed from location X, I may choose to do so again for
> perfectly good reasons even it says "my real location is Y".  Why
> micromanage? -Tim

I also concur. An aggregator is free to do so, but I don't think it should
be a requirement. We already have a mechanism for the publisher to redirect
requests to a new location (HTTP 304, 301).

An aggregator might also only do so in extremis - if the feed starts going
404, it could then try the last cached /feed/head/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'self'].

e. 

Reply via email to