* Tim Bray wrote: >If there were no further discussion: The WG completely failed to >converge to consensus on these issues last time around. Consensus can >still be found here. -Tim
I would suggests we contact implementers and ask them whether they will conform to these requirements or not. If we are not convinced that they will implement the spec as written, I consider the requirements point- less and misleading. How do we expect to manage updates to RFC3023 with/without this Pace? -- Bj�rn H�hrmann � mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] � http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 � Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 � http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim � PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 � http://www.websitedev.de/
