On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:30:20 +0200, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be inapropriate to forbit declaring the same namespace in multiple ways, but the div is still cruft and unnecessary for declaring namespaces, so I think the div shouldn't be required.
I kind of agree. We should state that the child elements of atom:content must be namespace qualified and within another namespace than Atom, but how people would like to accomplish this restriction is up to them, imho.
-- Asbj�rn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ �He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away�
