On 31 Jan 2005, at 12:43 am, Robert Sayre wrote:
How about "Make sure your id is unique from a character-by-character perspective, but also unique in the face of scheme-specific comparisons". That is, don't lean on scheme-specific comparisons to match URIs, but they don't have to be canonical either.
Yes, changing the wording to that is fine, as long as it also says processors that do scheme-specific comparison are bad.
a) http://Example.com/thing b) http://example.com/thing
a) is ok, but don't expect clients to match it to b).
"Expect a subset of clients to match b to a", surely?
Graham
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
