On 1/2/05 5:31 AM, "Antone Roundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another option would be to allow one <content> with inline content, and > alternative content by reference, eg. (not being careful about getting > language tags correct): +1
On 1/2/05 5:31 AM, "Antone Roundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another option would be to allow one <content> with inline content, and > alternative content by reference, eg. (not being careful about getting > language tags correct): +1