On 1/2/05 4:18 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. Feed Document may be somewhat misleading, because it's easy to > confuse it with Feed (which has connotations of the information > channel). I think "Feed Snapshot Document" or the like was once > proposed, but it was shot down. *shrug* "Atom Collection Document" might be even more accurate, as this also suits temporal period archives or a handpicked set of "best essays of 2004". If so, perhaps we could change the top level element name from <feed> to <collection>? Do we need a Pace? e.
