On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 19:22:10 +1100, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/2/05 7:18 PM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> This is better. I guess I just hadn't grok'd the idea of using > >> entries to reference feeds, but now that I see the angle brackets I > >> get it. > > > > Yes, feeds are entries. > > no, feeds are collections, entries describe resources, and while feeds are > also resources that only means that entries can describe feeds, not actually > be feeds. >
+1 on "entries can describe feeds, not actually be feeds". An entry can reference a feed, but is not the feed itself. > e. > > -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
